linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.18-mm1: true/false enum in linux/stddef.h fails glibc-2.4 compile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:57:04 +0200
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	ebuddington@...leyan.edu
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-mm1: true/false enum in linux/stddef.h fails glibc-2.4
	compile

On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:51 -0400, Eric Buddington wrote:
> There is an enum contained in some recent -mm versions of
> linux/stddef.h which seems to be horking my glibc-2.4 compile:
> 
> enum {
>         false   = 0,
>         true    = 1
> };
> 
> One way or another (I can't find where), 'true' and 'false' are
> getting defined to 1 and 0, turning the above into enum { 0=0, 1=1 },
> which though undeniable is not compilable.

I think you're making the mistake of using kernel headers for
userspace...... rather than the cleaned up headers.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/