linux-kernel - Re: Industrial device driver uio/uio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:32:25 +0200
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: Industrial device driver uio/uio_*

On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 12:18 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 19:59:54 +0100
> > I would just NAK it but want to be sure the guys saw the list of
> > problems
> > 
> 
> cc's added.
> 
> Thomas has been a bit tied up with timers and interrupts of late.

Yup. fork(tglx) still returns -ETOOMANYINSTANCES.

I have no objections, if you pull it from -mm for now. The list of flaws
is accepted and we'll work on this in foreseeable time, _IF_ there is
some basic consensus about the idea itself not being fundamentaly wrong.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/