linux-kernel - Free memory level in 2.6.16?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 05 Oct 2006 02:48:47 -0500
From:	Steve Bergman <sbergman@...b.com>
To:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Free memory level in 2.6.16?

Due to some problems I was having with the CentOS4.4 kernel, I just
moved a box (x86 with 4GB ram) to 2.6.16.29 from kernel.org.

All is well, but I am curious about one thing.  This is a fairly memory
hungry box, serving about 40 gnome desktops via xdmcp.  All VM settings
are at the default.  Swappiness=60, min_free_kbytes=3831.

However, it seems to seek out about 150MB for the level of free memory
that it maintains.  Typically I see somewhere between 100MB an 500MB in
swap, buffers+cache is about 500MB, and 150MB is free.

If I cat from /dev/md0 to /dev/null, the free memory does go down, to
25MB or so,  but then I can watch as it seeks out about 150MB of free
memory.

To me, free memory is wasted memory.  Is this a bug or a feature?

Thanks for any enlightenment.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/