linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] LOG2: Implement a general integer log2 facility in the kernel [try #4]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
cc:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, torvalds@...l.org,
	akpm@...l.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] LOG2: Implement a general integer log2 facility in
 the kernel [try #4]

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:34:14PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > +config ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U32
> > +	bool
> > +	default n
> 
> Why not "def_bool n"?  Or indeed, since the default is n, why not just
> "bool"?

Why so complicated and why do it at all? We already have fls and ffs 
amoung the bit operations and those map to cpu instructions on arches 
that support these. fls can be used as a log 2 facilities. If you need 
another name and further refine it then just add an inline function.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/