linux-kernel - Re: [patch] honour MNT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 07 Oct 2006 17:18:53 +0400
From:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()

Hello.

Alan Cox wrote:
> I doubt anyone uses access() any more for anything but this doesn't seem
Even though the access(X_OK) is mostly not needed
as the execve() would fail anyway, this is not the
case for ld.so. I think it would be a good idea for
ld.so to start using the access(R_OK | X_OK) before
open().

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/