| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Open Source <opensource3141@...oo.com> To: linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: USB performance bug since kernel 2.6.13 (CRITICAL???) (Resending because linux-usb-devel@...rceforge.net bounced right back to me. Sorry for the multiple messages!) ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Open Source <opensource3141@...oo.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-usb-devel@...rceforge.net Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:21:56 PM Subject: USB performance bug since kernel 2.6.13 (CRITICAL???) Hi all, I am writing regarding a performance issue that I recently observed after upgrading from kernel 2.6.12 to 2.6.17. I did some hunting around and have found that the issue first arises in 2.6.13. I am using a device that submits URBs asynchronously using the libusb devio infrastructure. In version 2.6.12 I am able to submit and reap URBs for my particular application at a transaction rate of one per millisecond. A transaction consists of a single WRITE URB (< 512 bytes) followed by a single READ URB (1024 bytes). Once I upgrade to version 2.6.13, the transactional rate drops to one per 4 milliseconds! The overall performance of a particular algorithm is increased from a total execution time of 75 seconds to over 160 seconds. The only difference between the two tests is the kernel. Microsoft Windows executes the algorithm in 70-75 seconds! I am using a Fedora Core distribution with FC4 kernels for testing. Is there some new incantation that is required in my user-mode driver to get around a "feature" in recent kernels? Does anyone else know about this? I was not able to easily find discussion about this on the newsgroups. It appears that this problem has been around for a while, if it is indeed a problem. I am not a subscriber to the linux-kernel mailing list but have cross-posted to it since this seems like a serious enough issue. Please continue to keep any responses on linux-usb-devel as well so I can see them in my email box. Thank you, Beleaguered Open Source Fan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists