| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:34:42 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: simoneau@....uri.edu Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [sparc64] 2.6.18 unaligned accesses in eth1394 From: Will Simoneau <simoneau@....uri.edu> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:37:26 -0400 > This will be difficult as the machine in question isn't one I want to > reboot too often. The running kernel and modules are compiled with debug > info, though; if I send you the relevant .o files will that help? The reason I asked for it in the image is because I want to tell gdb "x/10i 0xZZZZZ" using the exact program counters in the dumps and get exactly the instruction that is faulting. That is very difficult with modules since they can get loaded at any address, and the gdb listings you provided with those symbol-relative addresses were non-sensible, and that's why I can't match the true cause up right now. So whilst I can try with a module image, you'd have to do things like tell me exactly what is the base address of the loaded kernel module at the time of the message trigger and other non-trivial stuff like that to get me the debugging info I want to fix this. Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists