lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:47:13 -0500
From:	mfbaustx <mfbaustx@...il.com>
To:	"Oliver Neukum" <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: copy_from_user / copy_to_user with no swap space

>>> No. Your code may be only partially paged into RAM.
>>> The same can happen for any mmaped data.

That's what I thought I read.  But then my question is:  with on-demand  
paging, is it possible to have two processes partially paged?  Surely, it  
MUST be the case that any processes with overlapping logical address  
spaces must be paged coherently.  So, while on-demand "paging-in" allows  
for partial paging of a process, is it the case that, on a context switch,  
the user-space PTE's are completely erased (so that you get page-faults  
and can then on-demand page them in...)?





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ