linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:32:46 +0100 (IST)
From:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, vgoyal@...ibm.com,
	Steve Fox <drfickle@...ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
	Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kmannth@...ibm.com, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 04:58:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:16:13 -0400
>> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Can you please have a look at the attached patch
>>
>> Looks like a fine patch to me, although it could benefit from a comment
>> explaining why all those PAGE_ALIGN()s are in there.
>>
>>> and include it in -mm.
>>
>> Does it fix a patch in -mm or is it needed in mainline?
>
> The bug in my list was reported to be present in mainline [1].
>

Confirmed. This bug is present in 2.6.19-rc2

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/