lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:22:45 +1000
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
CC:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	johnstul@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: + i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups.patch added to -mm tree

Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 15:47 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
>>On Thursday 19 October 2006 15:44, Daniel Walker wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 14:26 -0700, akpm@...l.org wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c~i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c
>>>>--- a/arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c~i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups
>>>>+++ a/arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c
>>>>@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static struct clocksource clocksource_pi
>>>> 
>>>> static int __init init_pit_clocksource(void)
>>>> {
>>>>-	if (num_possible_cpus() > 4) /* PIT does not scale! */
>>>>+	if (num_possible_cpus() > 1) /* PIT does not scale! */
>>>> 		return 0;
>>>> 
>>>
>>>Can we ifdef some code here on CONFIG_SMP . It bugs me that there just
>>>dead code laying around on smp systems.
>>
>>The optimizer should optimize it all out since num_possible_cpus() is a 0
>>constant on UP.
> 
> 
> You just mean the if statement above though? I was talking more about
> the structure above this called "clocksource_pit" which isn't used on
> SMP systems due to this code addition. AFAIK init_pit_clocksource()
> could disappear along with the clocksource structure ..

An SMP kernel can boot on UP hardware, in which case I think
num_possible_cpus() will be 1, won't it?

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ