lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:54:36 -0700
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, mbligh@...gle.com, menage@...gle.com,
	Simon.Derr@...l.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dino@...ibm.com,
	rohitseth@...gle.com, holt@....com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, clameter@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus

Nick wrote:
> Well, it was supposed to be used for sched-domains partitioning, and
> its uselessness for anything else I guess is what threw me.

The use of cpu_exclusive for sched domain partitioning was added
later, by a patch from Dinikar, in April or May of 2005.

In hindsight, I think I made a mistake in agreeing to, and probably
encouraging, this particular overloading of cpu_exclusive.  I had
difficulty adequately understanding what was going on.

Granted, as we've noted elsewhere on this thread, the cpu_exclusive
flag is underutilized.  It gives cpusets so marked a certain limited
exclusivity to its cpus, relative to its siblings, but it doesn't do
much else, other than this controversial partitioning of sched domains.

There may well be a useful role for the cpu_exclusive flag in managing
sched domains and partitioning.  The current role is flawed, in my view.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists