linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reuse vector for __assign_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:00:29 -0700
From:	"Yinghai Lu" <yinghai.lu@....com>
To:	"Andi Kleen" <ak@....de>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"Muli Ben-Yehuda" <muli@...ibm.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>, "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reuse vector for __assign_irq_vector

Andi,

I think this patch could be in your tree after Eric's tree is getting
into mainstream.

YH

On 10/24/06, Lu, Yinghai <yinghai.lu@....com> wrote:
> >From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@...e.de]
> >Is that still needed with Eric's latest patches? I suppose not?
>
> It needs Eric's
>
> x86_64-irq-simplify-the-vector-allocator.patch
> x86_64-irq-only-look-at-per_cpu-data-for-online-cpus.patch
>
> Those two are in -mm tree now.
>
> Otherwise it can not be applied without FAIL.
>
> YH
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/