| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:14:32 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...gle.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com> Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4 > But I've become innoculated against warnings, just because we have too > many of the totally useless noise about deprecation and crud, and ppc has > it's own set of bogus compiler-and-linker-generated warnings.. > > At some point we should get rid of all the "politeness" warnings, just > because they can end up hiding the _real_ ones. Yay! Couldn't agree more. Does this mean you'll take patches for all the uninitialized variable crap from gcc 4.x ? > "pm_register is deprecated" etc - I get almost a hundred lines of warnings > in my default build (and half of those are sadly due to powerpc binutils, > that I can't do anythign about: "section .init.text exceeds stub group > size" etc, which is harmless _other_ than the fact that it helped hide the > real warnings just because I've grown too used to not looking too > closely). Doesn't turning off CONFIG_PM_LEGACY fix those? it did for me. M. PS. I still think -Werror is a good plan. But I acknowledge that's fairly extreme. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists