linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] NFS: nfsaclsvc_encode_getaclres() - Fix potential NULL deref and tiny optimization.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:26:00 +0100
From:	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
To:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Cc:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...washington.edu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@....unsw.edu.au>,
	nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: nfsaclsvc_encode_getaclres() - Fix potential NULL deref and tiny optimization.

On Saturday 28 October 2006 00:01, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > 3) There are two locations in the function where we may return before
> > > we use the value of the variable 'w', but we compute it at the very top
> > > of the function. So in the case where we return early we have wasted a
> > > few cycles computing a value that was never used.

Computing w later in the function is fine.

> > w should be an unsigned int.
>
> Makes sense.

No, this breaks the while loop further below: with an unsigned int, the loop 
counter underflows and wraps.

Please fix this identically in fs/nfsd/nfs2acl.c and fs/nfsd/nfs3acl.c.

Thanks,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/