lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:28:00 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	jeff@...zik.org, matthew@....cx, openib-general@...nib.org,
	linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Ordering between PCI config space writes and MMIO reads?

Quoting r. Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>:
> Subject: Re: Ordering between PCI config space writes and MMIO reads?
> 
>  > Here's what I don't understand: according to PCI rules, pci config read
>  > can bypass pci config write (both are non-posted).
>  > So why does doing it help flush the writes as the comment claims?
> 
> No, I don't believe a read of a config register can pass a write of
> the same register.  (Someone correct me if I'm wrong)

It can if PCI-X/PCI-Ex spec is anything to go by.

For example, see table 2-23, transaction ordering rules, in the PCI-express
spec: it is marked as "Y/N: there are no requirements.  The second transaction
may optionally pass the first transaction or be blocked by it."

In typical systems the OS should take care not to start a new
non-posted transaction before the previous one completed.
In particular, all intel and ppc systems I've seen simply block the CPU
unti the split completion arrives.

I find it hard to believe that Altix des not supply a way to check
that completion for config write transaction has arrived.


-- 
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ