linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce john-users owl-users popa3d-users / xvendor oss-security / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Order Openwall GNU/*/Linux 2.0 on a CD with delivery worldwide

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:33:11 -0500
From:	"Holden Karau" <holden@...scanfly.ca>
To:	"OGAWA Hirofumi" <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised

Whoops, sorry about that. Yes it would improve performance on fat12 &
fat16 [although I haven't tested it with fat12]. What I meant by that
sentance is that, fat sync performance is pretty bad with or without
my patch, its just slightly less worse with my patch :-)

On 10/31/06, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> wrote:
> "Holden Karau" <holden@...scanfly.ca> writes:
>
> > This patch is just meant to make fat32 sync performance better, not
> > necessarily make it usable for everyone [one step at a time and all
> > that].
>
> Sorry, I can't see your point. The FAT12 and FAT16 also have backup FAT.
> And the your patch didn't make performance better, right?
> --
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
>


-- 
Cell: 613-276-1645
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/