| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:33:11 -0500 From: "Holden Karau" <holden@...scanfly.ca> To: "OGAWA Hirofumi" <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> Cc: "Holden Karau" <holdenk@...dros.com>, "Josef Sipek" <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "akpm@...l.org" <akpm@...l.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, "Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, "Jörn Engel" <joern@...nheim.fh-wedel.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised Whoops, sorry about that. Yes it would improve performance on fat12 & fat16 [although I haven't tested it with fat12]. What I meant by that sentance is that, fat sync performance is pretty bad with or without my patch, its just slightly less worse with my patch :-) On 10/31/06, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> wrote: > "Holden Karau" <holden@...scanfly.ca> writes: > > > This patch is just meant to make fat32 sync performance better, not > > necessarily make it usable for everyone [one step at a time and all > > that]. > > Sorry, I can't see your point. The FAT12 and FAT16 also have backup FAT. > And the your patch didn't make performance better, right? > -- > OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> > -- Cell: 613-276-1645 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists