linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] paravirtualization: Patch inline replacements for common paravirt operations.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:54:00 -0800
From:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] paravirtualization: Patch inline replacements for
 common paravirt operations.

Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 15:27 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>   
>> On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:28:13 +1100
>> Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
>>     
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL
>>> +		/* Deliberately clobber regs using "not %reg" to find bugs. */
>>>       
>> That would be considered to be abusive of CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL.  A
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT which depends on CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL would be more
>> harmonious.
>>     
>
> I wasn't sure.  Making a config option for what is a one-liner seemed
> overkill.
>   

I have further stuff in my vmi-debug patch that can use 
CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT as well :)

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/