linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:02:01 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@...e.fr>,
	Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@...el.com>, toralf.foerster@....de,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions

Hi,

On Tuesday, 31 October 2006 20:56, you wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc4 compared to 2.6.18
> that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.

Can we please add the following two to the list of known regressions:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7082
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7207

They are regressions with respect to 2.6.17.x kernels, but still.

In both cases the commits that cause or trigger the problem have been
identified.  Moreover in the first case everyone involved seems to agree that
the commit should be reverted (at least temporarily).

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/