lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 14:06:00 +0000 From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org> Subject: Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 06:52:41PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > In fact, I would be very very very much in favor of, instead of the > above, defining a set of: > > readsb, readsw, readsl, readsq > writesb, writesw, writesl, writesq ARM already has these. Sounds like a good idea for everyone else to also implement them. 8) -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists