linux-kernel - Re: [rfc patch] i386: don't save eflags on task switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Nov 2006 16:46:25 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>
cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc patch] i386: don't save eflags on task switch



On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>
> There is no real need to save eflags in switch_to().  Instead,
> we can keep a constant value in the thread_struct and always
> restore that.

I don't really see the point. The "pushfl" isn't the expensive part, and 
it gives sane and expected semantics.

The "popfl" is the expensive part, and that's the thing that can't really 
even be removed.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/