linux-kernel - Re: [rfc patch] i386: don't save eflags on task switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 4 Nov 2006 22:55:56 -0500
From:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc:	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc patch] i386: don't save eflags on task switch

On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:09:42AM -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Every processor I've ever measured it on, popf is slower.  On P4, for 
> example, pushf is 6 cycles, and popf is 54.  On Opteron, it is 2 / 12.  
> On Xeon, it is 7 / 91.

pushf has to wait until all flag dependancies can be resolved.  On the 
P4 with >100 instructions in flight, that can take a long time.  Popf 
on the other hand has no dependancies on outstanding instructions as it 
resets the machine state.

		-ben
-- 
"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <dont@...ck.org>.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/