linux-kernel - Re: locking hierarchy based on lockdep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 06 Nov 2006 12:37:56 -0800
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	arjan@...radead.org
Subject: Re: locking hierarchy based on lockdep

 > interesting...perhaps if we layered say the directory structure on the 
 > list too like by the top level kernel directories drivers, kernel, mm, 
 > net, etc. it might be more readable.

I'm not sure that you need to do something manual or ad hoc like that,
although it might be necessary in the end.  I'd be curious to see how
the list of locks partitions up if you just divide it up into groups
of locks that have some relationship.  I guess the question is, if you
draw the graph whose nodes are locks and whose edges connect locks
that are held together, how many connected pieces does that graph have?

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/