linux-kernel - Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:12:12 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.

On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:52:00 +0100
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:

> Do you have the
> impression that high quality bug reports on lkml (with this I mean ones
> where there is sufficient information, which are not a request for
> support and where the reporter actually answers questions that are asked
> him) are not getting reasonable attention? 

Yes.

And why does the report quality matter?  If there's insufficient info you
just ask for more.

But we all know that and nothing's going to happen so there's really not
much point in discussing it.  I have 270 saved-up-lkml-bug-reports to
process.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/