linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: generic calibration support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:12:29 +0100
From:	Holger Schurig <hs4233@...l.mn-solutions.de>
To:	Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz-ml@...ssonline.ch>
Cc:	daniel.ritz@....ch, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: generic calibration support

> sorry, but i have to give you a big NACK on that one:

Hehe, I actually anticipated this NACK :-)

> - no more modparam: it should be per-device sysfs attributes
>   (swap_xy is basically only for touchkitusb compatibility and 
>    shoud be converted to per-device sysfs attribute as well. i
>   just never got to do it)

That would be okay for me.

> - calibration can be handled in userspace just fine

Yes it can, and that is the most convinging argument against my 
patch.

However, user-space calibration often sucks. For example, in X11 
the calibration values are stored in /etc/X11/xorg.conf, so a 
calibration program has to parse & write that file. And I've 
seen binary-only-calibration programs from vendors 
use /etc/X11/XF86Config, which doesn't exist here. Anyway, once 
you've calibrated you have to restart X-Windows, so you need to 
terminate all running X applications just because of a silly 
re-calibration. Not nice.

A calibration at kernel level (may it be input level or driver 
level) doesn't have this problem. I can make the level 
persistent via udev, modules.conf or other means. Even when I 
have a frame-buffer based calibration utility, the calibration 
would be OK for X11 or GTK/DirectFB as well.

For me, this speaks against "Calibration is purely a user-space 
problem".

> - even for in-kernel it's in the wrong place. there are other
>   devices that report raw absolute data...so it would belong to
>   the input layer 

Suppose I have a graphics tabled and a touchscreen connected at 
the same time. Can I distinguish this easily at the input layer 
level?

I can very easily distinguish this at the device driver level. 
After all, the individual calibration parameters are a property 
of this individual device.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/