linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] emit logging when a process receives a fatal signal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 18 Nov 2006 03:04:13 +0100
From:	Folkert van Heusden <folkert@...heusden.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] emit logging when a process receives a fatal signal

> > > I found that sometimes processes disappear on some heavily used system
> > > of mine without any logging. So I've written a patch against 2.6.18.2
> > > which emits logging when a process emits a fatal signal.
> > Why not to patch default signal handlers in glibc, to have not only
> > stderr, but syslog, or /dev/kmsg copy of fatal messages?
> Afaik when a proces gets shot because of a segfault, also the libraries
> it used are shot so to say. iirc some of the more fatal signals are
> handled directly by the kernel.

Also: what about statically build programs?


Folkert van Heusden

-- 
Feeling generous? -> http://www.vanheusden.com/wishlist.php
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/