linux-kernel - Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:34:03 +0300
From:	Dmitry Mishin <dim@...nvz.org>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>, Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>,
	Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework

On Wednesday 22 November 2006 11:43, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Dmitry Mishin <dim@...nvz.org> writes:
> 
> > On Tuesday 21 November 2006 21:01, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> >> > Cedric,
> >> >
> >> > Dmitry Mishin and Daniel Lezcano are working together on the full
> >> > network namespace incorporating both needs of OpenVZ and VServer/IBM.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Kirill
> >>
> >> Kirill,
> >>
> >> We will need this framework to move the network isolation code to the
> >> ns_proxy/net_namespace structure. So if Cedric gives us a empty
> >> framework it is fine, except if someone does not agree with it...
> >>
> >>    -- Daniel.
> > This patch looks acceptable for us.
> > BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do not see a 
> > reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work and move existent 
> > patchset over his interface.
> 
> If you are going to take that attitude.  Where was this conversation?
> 
> It appears several relevant people were not aware of this development
> discussion.  So when it comes up for general review you can expect your
> approach as well as your code to be critiqued.
Eric, 

please read and comment Daniel's summary:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=116352117000763&w=2

Seems, that you missed it.

-- 
Thanks,
Dmitry.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/