lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:16:40 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com> To: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: more pedantry: "depends on" versus "depends" versus "requires" i'm thinking that the kconfig structure doesn't really need to support all three of these dependency directives for Kconfig files. a quick occurrence count: "depends on": 4421 "depends": 45 "requires": 0 under the circumstances, why not just standardize on "depends on" everywhere and remove the obvious redundancy from the scripts/kconfig/ parser files? rday - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists