linux-kernel - Re: la la la la ... swappiness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 3 Dec 2006 21:13:07 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
cc:	Aucoin@...ston.RR.com,
	"'Tim Schmielau'" <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, clameter@....com
Subject: Re: la la la la ... swappiness



On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:56:30 -0600
> "Aucoin" <Aucoin@...ston.RR.com> wrote:
> 
> > I hope I haven't muddied things up even more but basically what we want to
> > do is find a way to limit the number of cached pages for disk I/O on the OS
> > filesystem, even if it drastically slows down the untar and verify process
> > because the disk I/O we really care about is not on any of the OS
> > partitions.
> 
> Try mounting that fs with `-o sync'.

Wouldn't it be much nicer to just lower the dirty-page limit?

	echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
	echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio

or something. Which we already discussed in another thread and almost 
already decided we should lower the values for big-mem machines..

Hmm?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/