linux-kernel - Re: RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:54:20 +0100
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz@....ch>, Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Brice Goglin <brice@...i.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Bauke Jan Douma <bjdouma@...all.nl>,
	Tomasz Koprowski <tomek@...rowski.org>, gregkh@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16

Hi Adrian,

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:24:30 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> While checking how to fix the VIA quirk regressions for several users 
> introduced into -stable in 2.6.16.17, I started looking through all 
> drivers/pci/quirks.c updates up to both -stable and 2.6.19.
> 
> Below is the selection the seemed good and safe.
> 
> Any comments on whether it's really good or whether I should change 
> anything?
> (...)
> Jean Delvare (1):
>       PCI: Unhide the SMBus on Asus PU-DLS

Should be safe.

> Tomasz Koprowski (1):
>       PCI: SMBus unhide on HP Compaq nx6110

Bug #6944 might be related to this one, so I'd not include it in
2.6.16-stable.

-- 
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/