linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] efi is_memory_available ia64 hack build fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Dec 2006 02:53:12 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...emonkey.org.uk,
	"Myaskouvskey, Artiom" <artiom.myaskouvskey@...el.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, shai.satt@...el.com,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi is_memory_available ia64 hack build fix

On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 02:33:36 -0800
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:

> The addition of an is_available_memory() routine to some arch i386
> code, along with an extern for it in efi.h, caused the ia64 build
> to fail, which has the apparently identical routine, marked 'static'.
> 
> The ia64 build fails with:
> 
> arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c:229: error: static declaration of 'is_available_memory' follows non-static declaration
> include/linux/efi.h:305: error: previous declaration of 'is_available_memory' was here              

That already got named to is_memory_available()

(Which I suspect is the wrong fix, because the function serves the same
purpose on ia64 as it does on x86[_64], but nobody listens to me)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/