linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: two bugfixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:41:04 -0800 (PST)
From:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: two bugfixes


--- "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:

> ...
> The other is that root can lose capabilities by
> executing files with
> only some capabilities set.  The next two patches
> change these
> behaviors.

It was the intention of the POSIX group that
capabilities be independent of uid. I would
argue that the old bevavior was correct, that
a program marked to lose a capability ought
to even if the uid is 0.


Casey Schaufler
casey@...aufler-ca.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/