[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:57:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
cc: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: Mach-O binary format support and Darwin syscall personality
[Was: uts banner changes]
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > Secondly, is there a preferred existing field into which I should
> > stick said flag or just stuff it somewhere?
>
> Yes, thread_info->flags.
Well, it may actually make sense to actually stick the whole "syscall
table pointer" in there, rather than a flag that says which pointer to
choose.
We already load the thread_info pointer because we need the flags for
syscall tracing, and since we have the thread_info pointer, it might be
easier to load the syscall table pointer right off there, rather than
loading it as a big constant with "lis + ori" (in fact, on ppc64, we
currently load it off the TOC, which is really sad, since we already
brought in the thread_info into the cache, and usign the TOC is not just a
load, it's a load off a separate cacheline).
So on 64-bit ppc, it could actually speed things up to put the system call
table pointer into thread_info, and make it more flexible at the same
time, without any conditional flags.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists