linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add a new section to CodingStyle, promoting include/linux/kernel.h.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:57:04 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Cc:	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a new section to CodingStyle, promoting
 include/linux/kernel.h.

On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:43:35 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> 
>   Add a new section to the CodingStyle file, encouraging people not to
> re-invent available kernel macros such as ARRAY_SIZE(),
> FIELD_SIZEOF(), min() and max(), among others.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...dspring.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>


> ---
> 
>   NOTE:  at the moment, there is not a single invocation of the
> FIELD_SIZEOF() macro anywhere in the entire source tree, so if someone
> had a hankering to rename it to something more catchy, now would be a
> good time and i can always resubmit the patch i sent in yesterday.
> 
> 
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> index 0ad6dcb..a736333 100644
> --- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
> +++ b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> @@ -682,6 +682,24 @@ result.  Typical examples would be functions that return pointers; they use
>  NULL or the ERR_PTR mechanism to report failure.
> 
> 
> +		Chapter 17:  Don't re-invent the kernel macros
> +
> +The header file include/linux/kernel.h contains a number of macros that
> +you should use, rather than explicitly coding some variant of them yourself.
> +For example, if you need to calculate the length of an array, take advantage
> +of the macro
> +
> +  #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0]))
> +
> +Similarly, if you need to calculate the size of some structure member, use
> +
> +  #define FIELD_SIZEOF(t, f) (sizeof(((t*)0)->f))
> +
> +There are also min() and max() macros that do strict type checking if you
> +need them.  Feel free to peruse that header file to see what else is already
> +defined that you shouldn't reproduce in your code.
> +
> +
> 
>  		Appendix I: References

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/