linux-kernel - Re: Changes to sysfs PM layer break userspace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:02:14 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: Changes to sysfs PM layer break userspace

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:56:27 -0800
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:

> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 7:51 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > > +	if (!warned) {
> > > +		printk(KERN_WARNING
> > > +			"*** WARNING *** sysfs devices/.../power/state files "
> > > +			"are only for testing, and will be removed\n");
> > > +		warned = error;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > >  	/* disallow incomplete suspend sequences */
> > >  	if (dev->bus && (dev->bus->suspend_late || dev->bus->resume_early))
> > >  		return error;
> > 
> > Well that's not much use.  It tells people "hey, we broke it".  They
> > already knew that.
> 
> No, it only does what you asked for:  warning people that they're using
> something that's going away.  It says nothing about "broke".
> 

But it's still broken, is it not?

> 
> > What we should do is to revert 047bda36150d11422b2c7bacca1df324c909c0b3 and
> 
> Bad answer

Is better than breaking stuff.

> ... see my original reply in this thread.  If "the answer" is
> to involve making PCI devices work again, better solutions include reverting
> the patch I mentioned (adding the suspend_late/resume_early support to PCI)
> or a version of what Matthew has produced (poking through bus layers so
> that test can be made to fail when the bus supports those methods but the
> specific device's driver doesn't use them).
> 

We appear to have a choice of three options.  But I see no fix in Greg's
tree.  Please let's not just accidentally forget to do this.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/