linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] remove 556 unneeded #includes of sched.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:42:29 +0100 (CET)
From:	Tim Schmielau <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de>
To:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
cc:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove 556 unneeded #includes of sched.h

On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Russell King wrote:

> To cover these, you need to build at least rpc_defconfig, lubbock_defconfig,
> netwinder_defconfig, badge4_defconfig, cerf_defconfig, ...etc...

OK, I'll try to do that.
Do I need to build all the configs in arch/arm/configs?

> The whole "all*config" idea on ARM is utterly useless - you can _not_
> get build coverage that way.

Or shall I exclude the arm specific drivers for now?

Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/