linux-kernel - Re: Binary Drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:59:52 +0100
From:	Rok Markovic <kernel@...ardia.eu>
To:	James C Georgas <jgeorgas@...ers.com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Binary Drivers

Do we have a right to reverse engineer hardware, or they are protected by
patents or something similar that would prevent you from publishing results
adn/or drivers (open source).

Are there any restrictions in how you obtain information - signal analyser,
disassembly of windows driver, etc.

Rok Markovic

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/