| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:50:21 +0800 From: "Zhou Yingchao" <yingchao.zhou@...il.com> To: "yunfeng zhang" <zyf.zeroos@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.16.29 1/1] memory: enhance Linux swap subsystem 2006/12/27, yunfeng zhang <zyf.zeroos@...il.com>: > To multiple address space, multiple memory inode architecture, we can introduce > a new core object -- section which has several features Do you mean "in-memory inode" or "memory node(pglist_data)" by "memory inode" ? > The idea issued by me is whether swap subsystem should be deployed on layer 2 or > layer 3 which is described in Documentation/vm_pps.txt of my patch. To multiple > memory inode architecture, the special memory model should be encapsulated on > layer 3 (architecture-dependent), I think. I guess that you are wanting to do something to remove arch-dependent code in swap subsystem. Just like the pud introduced in the page-table related codes. Is it right? However, you should verify that your changes will not deteriorate system performance. Also, you need to maintain it for a long time with the evolution of mainline kernel before it is accepted. Best regards -- Yingchao Zhou *********************************************** Institute Of Computing Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences *********************************************** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists