linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make BH_Unwritten a first class bufferhead flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:57:45 +1100
From:	David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make BH_Unwritten a first class bufferhead flag

On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:54:02PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> this doesn't look like a full first class flag to me yet.  Don't
> we need to check for buffer_unwritten in the places we're checking
> for buffer_delay so we can stop setting buffer_delay for unwritten
> buffers?

That would be __block_prepare_write() and block_truncate_page()?
I can't see anywhere else in the code where buffer_delay is used
outside XFS....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/