linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Implement shadow directory support for device classes.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:43:09 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Implement shadow directory support for device classes.

Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> writes:

> Or you can try it with any of the subsystems that have already been
> converted over to use the struct device code, like misc, mem, and many
> others.  Just look for the symlinks in /sys/class/CLASS_NAME/ instead of
> real subdirectories.
>
> So I'd really prefer to not apply this patch, and just do this kind of
> work for 'struct device' instead.

I don't want to get stuck waiting for cleanups so I will keep this one,
even if you don't apply it :)  

But I will go figure out the equivalent version for struct device, as
it doesn't look like you are that far off from merging that version. :)

That way my code will work whichever code base I have to merge against.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/