| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:41:11 -0500 From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> To: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com> Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Sunil Naidu <akula2.shark@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dirk.hohndel@...el.com, alan@...hat.com, ksummit-2007-discuss@...nk.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:30:56PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > > Dave Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:06:17AM +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > > Then there is the issue of architectures, at least in my book KS should > > > focus on the ones that are really live and not in maintenance mode. > > > x86_64, x86_32, PPC, ia64, ARM seems to be the driving ones these days, > > > m68k, Sparc32, and others, somewhat less so ..... > > > > Again, I don't recall us spending any time at all discussing m68k, or > > sparc, whilst the others you mention were well represented. > > Well, others where represented, I was there looking after non-mmu m68k > for example (and other general non-mmu stuff). There just wasn't much > contentious stuff in that space that needed wider discussion. Right, other than during the CPU architects panel, I don't remember any non x86/ia64/ppc stuff being brought up at all. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists