lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:09:34 +0100
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, akpm@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johnstul@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/23] clocksource: new clock lookup method

On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 10:07 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> I'm assuming that programmers will test their code, and others will
> review the code .. Catering to any other situation doesn't make sense to
> me. On top of that those clocks are rare, and not desirable ..

So what are you arguing about burden ? It is a property of the
clocksource, that it is continuous, and not the other way round. It does
not matter how rare or desirable devices are.

What about the other bunch of useless defines:

+#define CLOCKSOURCE_NOT_ATOMIC         4
+#define CLOCKSOURCE_UNDER_32BITS       8
+#define CLOCKSOURCE_64BITS             16

Are those just for fun or are you actually putting the burden to get
them straight on the poor overworked clocksource developer ?

Also please define bit values as hexadecimal constants and not as
integers.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ