linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:37:40 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, y-goto@...fujitsu.com,
	clameter@...r.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with
 memory-less-node

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:43:44 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > > and to 
> > > accurately present the machine's topology to the user without us having to
> > > go adding falsehoods like this?
> > 
> > a node is a piece of memory. Without memory it doesn't make sense.
> 
> Who said?  I can pick up a piece of circuitry which has four CPUs and no
> RAM, wave it about then stick it in a computer.  The kernel is just wrong,
> surely?
> 
As far as I remember, this was the first e-mail which tells me that there are
- cpu only node
- device only node
- memory only node
during node-hot-plug discussion.

http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/linux-ia64/0405/9679.html

Thanks,
-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/