linux-kernel - Re: The who needs reviews anyways [PATCH]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 08 Feb 2007 21:29:01 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
Subject: Re: The who needs reviews anyways [PATCH]

On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:20:49 +0100, Roman Zippel said:
> > The point is, neither $BASH nor /bin/bash may be set.
> 
> Is that really a problem? I think any system that has bash without 
> /bin/bash is simply broken.

If you're trying to bootstrap a Linux box onto a new platform from some
non-Linux Unixoid, it's possible that bash lives in $TOOLCHAIN/bin/bash.

But I see that even Solaris 9 has a bash 2.05 in /bin/bash, so I might be
talking out some odd orifice here.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped