linux-kernel - Re: [patches] [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [4/25] x86: kernel-mode faults pollute current->thead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:00:25 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Cc:	"Jeff Dike" <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...-64.org
Subject: Re: [patches] [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [4/25] x86: kernel-mode faults pollute current->thead

On Tuesday 13 February 2007 08:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >Yup.  How does this patch look to you?  We set error_code and trap_no
> >for userspace faults and kernel faults which call die().  We don't set
> >them for kernelspace faults which are fixed up.
> 
> Actually, after a second round of thinking I believe there's still more to do
> - your second patch missed fixing i386's do_trap() similarly to x86-64's
> and, vice versa, x86-64's do_general_protection() similarly to i386's.

I dropped the patch for now until that is all worked out

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/