linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:03:35 -0500
From:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To:	"Ananiev, Leonid I" <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>
Cc:	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
	Suparna bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event

On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 07:57:49PM +0300, Ananiev, Leonid I wrote:
> Zach> This addresses an oops reported by Leonid Ananiev
> <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>
> Zach> as archived at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/8/337.
> ....
> Zach> This was tested by running O_DIRECT aio-stress concurrently with
> buffered reads
> 
> The oops was with aio-stress only running in the loop
> WITHOUT buffered or mmaped IO which are patched and discussed now.
> Actually 47% aio is finished with EIO after patch.

I looked through the thread and couldn't find the aio-stress command
line used for the whole test.  Could you please post it here?

If aio+dio is being used to extend the file, you'll get pages in the
page cache, which is hopefully why you're able to trigger the EIOs.

-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/