linux-kernel - circular locking: /proc/sys/vm/drop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:35:38 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: circular locking: /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches


Andrew,

i just got the lockdep warning below when doing:

  echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches

is this a known quirk in the drop_caches code?

	Ingo

=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.20-syslet #434
-------------------------------------------------------
bash/12166 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&journal->j_list_lock){--..}, at: [<c01c82f5>] journal_try_to_free_buffers+0xd5/0x18f

but task is already holding lock:
 (inode_lock){--..}, at: [<c01947a3>] drop_pagecache+0x45/0xc8

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (inode_lock){--..}:
       [<c0144940>] __lock_acquire+0x984/0xa94
       [<c0144d6f>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x8c
       [<c0424a9f>] _spin_lock+0x35/0x42
       [<c0193ccb>] __mark_inode_dirty+0xe3/0x15e
       [<c016253b>] __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0xb4/0xbf
       [<c0197361>] mark_buffer_dirty+0x1e/0x20
       [<c01c7af2>] __journal_temp_unlink_buffer+0x176/0x17d
       [<c01c7d23>] __journal_unfile_buffer+0xb/0x15
       [<c01c7d97>] __journal_refile_buffer+0x6a/0xe3
       [<c01cac34>] journal_commit_transaction+0xf46/0x11da
       [<c01cd32c>] kjournald+0xab/0x1e8
       [<c013b935>] kthread+0xb2/0xd7
       [<c0104e5f>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
       [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff

-> #0 (&journal->j_list_lock){--..}:
       [<c014483b>] __lock_acquire+0x87f/0xa94
       [<c0144d6f>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x8c
       [<c0424a9f>] _spin_lock+0x35/0x42
       [<c01c82f5>] journal_try_to_free_buffers+0xd5/0x18f
       [<c01b944e>] ext3_releasepage+0x68/0x74
       [<c015d027>] try_to_release_page+0x33/0x44
       [<c016406e>] invalidate_mapping_pages+0x69/0xca
       [<c01640dc>] invalidate_inode_pages+0xd/0x11
       [<c01947bf>] drop_pagecache+0x61/0xc8
       [<c019485c>] drop_caches_sysctl_handler+0x36/0x4e
       [<c012efdc>] do_rw_proc+0xaf/0xf1
       [<c012f078>] proc_writesys+0x20/0x25
       [<c017b3de>] vfs_write+0xb1/0x165
       [<c017bbc6>] sys_write+0x3d/0x61
       [<c01041a8>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
       [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff

other info that might help us debug this:

2 locks held by bash/12166:
 #0:  (&type->s_umount_key#17){----}, at: [<c0194793>] drop_pagecache+0x35/0xc8
 #1:  (inode_lock){--..}, at: [<c01947a3>] drop_pagecache+0x45/0xc8

stack backtrace:
 [<c010510d>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x19/0x2e
 [<c0105206>] show_trace+0x12/0x14
 [<c010521c>] dump_stack+0x14/0x16
 [<c01433ff>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x5f/0x68
 [<c014483b>] __lock_acquire+0x87f/0xa94
 [<c0144d6f>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x8c
 [<c0424a9f>] _spin_lock+0x35/0x42
 [<c01c82f5>] journal_try_to_free_buffers+0xd5/0x18f
 [<c01b944e>] ext3_releasepage+0x68/0x74
 [<c015d027>] try_to_release_page+0x33/0x44
 [<c016406e>] invalidate_mapping_pages+0x69/0xca
 [<c01640dc>] invalidate_inode_pages+0xd/0x11
 [<c01947bf>] drop_pagecache+0x61/0xc8
 [<c019485c>] drop_caches_sysctl_handler+0x36/0x4e
 [<c012efdc>] do_rw_proc+0xaf/0xf1
 [<c012f078>] proc_writesys+0x20/0x25
 [<c017b3de>] vfs_write+0xb1/0x165
 [<c017bbc6>] sys_write+0x3d/0x61
 [<c01041a8>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
 =======================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/