linux-kernel - Re: PREEMPT_RCU breaks anon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:13:47 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@...r.sgi.com>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RCU breaks anon_vma locking ?

On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:

> Two, in his SLUB thread it sounds like he's toying with mixing up kmem
> caches of similar sizes: that seems a really bad idea to me (for reasons
> Andi and others have made) and I expect it'll get dropped; but in case
> not, let's note that the anon_vma cache is one which would fare very
> badly from getting mixed in with others (lock would no longer remain
> a lock, list would no longer remain a list, across that race).

Dont worry DESTROY_BY_RCU slabs wont be mixed with those not marked 
DESTROY_BY_RCU.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/