linux-kernel - Re: sparc64 / bbc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:12:19 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	j.j.green@...ffield.ac.uk
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sparc64 / bbc_i2c.c

From: "J.J.Green" <j.j.green@...ffield.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:58:48 +0000 (GMT)

> Hi Andrew
> 
> > The code around there looks relatively unbuggy to me.  Removing that
> > remove_wait_queue() would be very bad - it would cause later stack
> > corruption.
> >
> > msleep_interruptible() certainly shouldn't consume CPU like that.  Do we
> > know where the CPU time is being spent?  The output of:
> >
> > readprofile -r
> > sleep 10
> > readprofile -n -v -m /boot/System.map | sort -n -k 3 | tail -40
> >
> > would tell us.
> 
> As was mentioned in another reply, this message by
> Joerg Friedrich
> 
>    http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2007/02/msg00045.html
> 
> gives a possible explanantion of where the time is going.
> I applied the patch to the debian kernel sources for 2.6.18,
> it applied cleanly and fixed the problem.

I've added Joerg's patch to my tree and will push it into
-stable as well.

Reviewing this patch had been sitting deep in my backlog for weeks, I
just never got around to it, sorry.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/