linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] adapt page_lock_anon_vma() to PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:25:17 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc:	hugh@...itas.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, clameter@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] adapt page_lock_anon_vma() to PREEMPT_RCU

> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:06:21 +0300 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru> wrote:
> page_lock_anon_vma() uses spin_lock() to block RCU. This doesn't work with
> PREEMPT_RCU, we have to do rcu_read_lock() explicitely. Otherwise, it is
> theoretically possible that slab returns anon_vma's memory to the system
> before we do spin_unlock(&anon_vma->lock).
> 
> ...
>
> +static void page_unlock_anon_vma(struct anon_vma *anon_vma)
> +{
> +	spin_unlock(&anon_vma->lock);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>  }

It's a bit sad doing a double preempt_disable() for non-PREEMPT_RCU builds.

Perhaps we would benefit from a new rcu_read_lock_preempt_rcu() which is a
no-op if !PREEMPT_RCU.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/