lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:22:56 +1100 From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> To: Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@...il.com> CC: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Lorenzo Allegrucci <l_allegrucci@...oo.it>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> Subject: Re: SMP performance degradation with sysbench Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On 2/26/07, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote: > >> Rik van Riel wrote: >> > Lorenzo Allegrucci wrote: >> > >> >> Hi lkml, >> >> >> >> according to the test below (sysbench) Linux seems to have scalability >> >> problems beyond 8 client threads: >> >> http://jeffr-tech.livejournal.com/6268.html#cutid1 >> >> http://jeffr-tech.livejournal.com/5705.html >> >> Hardware is an 8-core amd64 system and jeffr seems willing to try more >> >> Linux versions on that machine. >> >> Anyway, is there anyone who can reproduce this? >> > >> > >> > I have reproduced it on a quad core test system. >> > >> > With 4 threads (on 4 cores) I get a high throughput, with >> > approximately 58% user time and 42% system time. >> > >> > With 8 threads (on 4 cores) I get way lower throughput, >> > with 37% user time, 29% system time 35% idle time! >> > >> > The maximum time taken per query also increases from >> > 0.0096s to 0.5273s. Ouch! >> > >> > I don't know if this is MySQL, glibc or Linux kernel, >> > but something strange is going on... >> >> Like you, I'm also seeing idle time start going up as threads increase. >> >> I initially thought this was a problem with the multiprocessor scheduler, >> because the pattern is exactly like some artificat in the load balancing. >> >> However, after looking at the stats, and testing a couple of things, I >> think it may not be after all. >> >> I've reproduced this on a 8-socket/16-way dual core Opteron. So far what >> I am seeing is that MySQL is having trouble putting enough load into the >> scheduler. > > > Here are some graphs from the 4-socket/8-way Xeon box (no SMT, no MC > in .config) I posted about earlier. > > transactions.png resembles Nick's results pretty closely, in that a > drop-off occurs, at the same # of threads, too. That seems weird to > me, but I haven't thought about it too closely. Shouldn't Nick's be > dropping off closer to 16 threads (that would be 1 per core, then, > right?) I don't think it is exactly a matter of processes >= cores, but rather just a general problem at higher concurrency. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists